logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

A Masterpiece of Bad Regulation

January 25, 2017

As congressional Republicans head for Philadelphia today to set goals for the new year, the president announced one of his own: erase 75 percent of government regulations affecting business.

This is either hyperbole, intended to grab attention. Or its aspirational, less an expectation than a stretch that will still achieve a lot. In any event, 75 percent of anything is a big chunk. Especially if it’s three-quarters of the 3,300 new regulations that a recent survey by the National Association of Manufacturers found are promulgated each year.

So even though the president set an ambitious goal, the Obama administration left behind a target-rich environment for pursuing it. And it’s a goal that job-hungry voters will approve. They understand that whatever their presumed benefits, regulations do not create jobs; they only come from investment and economic growth.

That’s why the president’s de-regulatory goal is ideal for a GOP eager to deliver the goods to restive voters as well as a smart goal for Democrats who’ll face them in two years. Today’s voters aren’t traditional party loyalists; they want action to spur good jobs.

With an embarrassment of bad regulations to choose from, where to start? There is no better place to start than with the stream rule, a massive regulation finalized in the waning days of the Obama administration by the Office of Surface Mining  Reclamation and Enforcement.

The stream rule is to bad regulations what the Sistine Chapel is to Renaissance art.  It’s a pure expression of all that ordinary Americans loathe about rule by bureaucracy.

It costs jobs (a third at least), it’s redundant (duplicates what states and other federal agencies are already doing), unnecessary (state reports show companies achieve reclamation with little off-site impact), unlawful (contradicts clear congressional intent in existing law) and self-serving (OSM expands its authority at the expense of states and other federal agencies).

What’s there not to hate about the stream rule?

There is one redeeming thing: it’s ripe for extinction under the Congressional Review Act. With a simple majority vote of both houses, Congress can send the president a gift-wrapped pledge of allegiance to the larger goal of creating good jobs and growing the economy.

  • On January 25, 2017
Recent Blog Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
  • New U.S. Coal Capacity is Coming
  • Another Global Pivot to Coal?
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024