logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Boosting US Coal Exports Vital to WV’s Economy

Via The Herald-Dispatch:

I am often asked about the future of coal in the United States. And I always respond by saying that’s the wrong question. The right question is this: What is the future of coal globally?

Today the global need for coal to generate electricity and produce steel is rising, even as its use continues to drop in the U.S. This growth – and the need for infrastructure improvements – is especially important in cities with the largest coal exports, namely Norfolk, Baltimore, Houston, New Orleans and Mobile.

We need to build a 21st century network of highways, bridges, airports, railroads that would make it a lot easier and cheaper to ship Appalachian coal to Europe, South America and Asia, where there is increasing demand for U.S. energy supplies. Expanding coal exports is the key to keeping coal mines open and Appalachia’s economy strong.

Roughly 10 percent of the nation’s coal production is exported. Last year total exports were approximately 89 million tons, a 48 percent increase over 2016, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The upturn in exports was particularly important in Appalachia.

But eventually, if this growth is to be sustained, there must be a major government investment in port facilities, railroads and inland waterways used for shipping coal. And, in the Pacific Northwest, additional coal terminals need to be built so that the U.S. can compete with other coal-exporting countries such as Australia and South Africa for Asia’s lucrative coal market.

Exporting coal is in our national interest. America’s exports of coal are playing a critically important role in reducing Europe’s dependence on Russia’s energy supplies. Two of our significant customers for coal are Poland and Ukraine, countries trying to break loose from Russia’s political and economic grip.

Appalachia’s unheralded role in Europe’s quest for energy independence is something those who want to keep fossil fuels in the ground conveniently ignore. The billions of dollars of export revenues also contribute to the U.S. balance of payments deficit. But it illustrates the political disadvantages under which coal operates.

Exporting coal must be a key part of the answer to building a world with abundant energy. China, which consumes as much coal as the rest of the world combined and is by far the largest driver of the global coal market, is not America’s largest coal customer in Asia. South Korea is.

The great advantage of coal is its low cost and reliability, both in the U.S. and worldwide. This is what helps explain the vast difference between coal and renewable energy sources. Coal can be stored at power plants around the world, whereas there is still no technology for large-scale storage of solar and wind power, requiring back-up electricity from fossil fuels on days when the weather isn’t cooperating.

To meet the world’s growing need for energy, U.S. coal should be front and center. China, India and many other countries need large amounts of power from coal to drive their economies and lift millions of people out of poverty. Just as it is here, coal is the bulwark of their electricity grids. By modernizing coal ports, the United States can ramp up its exports, something that is good for Appalachia and the world.

W.D. Blackburn has worked extensively in the U.S. and international coal industry and currently heads an energy consultingfirm, BLACKACRELLC, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

See the article here.

  • On February 27, 2018
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024